/
/
/
/
Dashboard

Quick Links

Watch List

Drag any system on page
to here.

C2 Ticker


Collective2 Pulse

Latest Reviews

ETF Timer
 Although the system almost had five consecutive loosing hands since early June, the entry points seem useful. I replicated his entries, but closed positions when profit was reasonable, including the latest trading that I closed my positions on 08/30. Therefore, among hi...
ETF Timer
 This was an excellent system and then a change was made. In January, the developer dropped intra day trade releases and now they are all end of day. The problem is that drawdowns have been enhanced and profits diminished. A 4 month drawdown tells me something may be ...
ETF Timer
 Im afraid Jim has completely lost the plot. His indicators work in a strongly trending market, like in 2008 and 2009, but they completely fail in a non-trending market. Instead of adapting to market change, Jim stubbornly executes is trades and incurs loss after loss. ...
ETF Timer
 This used to be a good system when it executed trades anytime during the day. Since it went to a beginning and end of day system, it has lost many chances to take profits at obvious times - like the bounce off SPX 1040. Losing faith Jim - and money.

Most looked-at this hour

Moving up
Moving down
1
ETF Timer
2
Babson ETF Timer
3
Glory Trades
4
Babson
5
Bond Portfolio E9
6
eminialerts
7
E-mini S...ney Machine
8
EMD Day Trader
9
Speculationtrader
10
Sutton I
11
CEFA
12
ETF TrendRider
13
Druni
14
ETF Timer 2
15
Babson Options only
16
precision timing
17
Safe Harbor
18
es masterpiece
19
Money Machine Forex
20
Turning Points


Trading System Forums

See AllPost Msg
Forum: MetaTrader Forum
 Subject: Does C2 support Buy and Sell at the same time?

Hedging (in forex) isn't allowed in the US. Being long and short the same instrument costs extra spreads and commissions, and gives you no benefit. It is the same as being flat. Over the past few years, I have asked people on various trading forums to present a case where being long and short the same i...

Forum: MetaTrader Forum
 Subject: Does C2 support Buy and Sell at the same time?

Just wondering why C2 doesnt support hedging (dont some of the brokers you use allow hedging?) - Their are valid hedging strategies and it seems like it would be up to the end user to decide if they wanted to use a hedging EA or not. Just askin'.

Forum: C2 Forum
 Subject: To clarify

Joseph When I buy dem beans or dem bonds I do the one contract unless I want more. Sometimes C2 puts a number in the box automatically, but that is probably the number I put in the box before

Forum: C2 Forum
 Subject: A few questions about C2.

Matt, What about switching to whatever the industry standard is so that people can easily compare.

Forum: C2 Forum
 Subject: Options on futures

When I press the right buttons it says lookup stock/etf options. Have not seen futures options.

Forum: C2 Forum
 Subject: Options on futures

Does Collective 2 allow trading in options on futures?

Find System by Name

Wait

Advanced

Featured System

EMD Day Trader

Hypothetical Results
Trades Futures
P/L per $10K invested
  on Oct 28 $6,774
Ann Return 78.0%
Sharpe Ratio 1.682
Worst Drawdown 15.67%
$99 per month - only if profitable
What is a Featured System?

Gainers and losers show hypothetical account results.
Show math | Hide this notice 3 days
Gainers
Losers
Gainers this week

WCM IM
224.4%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $110,703 to $359,145 since August 26, 2010.
FX Tactical
103.3%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $6,648 to $13,517 since August 26, 2010.
Nicks System
53.3%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $13,886 to $21,293 since August 26, 2010.
KTRAK
43.4%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $115,501 to $165,592 since August 26, 2010.
MASTeR_1
35.2%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $9,298 to $12,574 since August 26, 2010.
FOREX YX SIGNAL
33.8%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $42,739 to $57,171 since August 26, 2010.
Good Kachi
28.2%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $112,713 to $144,526 since August 26, 2010.
emini independence
28.1%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $10,540 to $13,497 since August 26, 2010.
Trading the trend
26.5%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $13,996 to $17,701 since August 26, 2010.
a
26.4%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $9,023 to $11,407 since August 26, 2010.
MM
25.1%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $8,127 to $10,170 since August 26, 2010.
test2
24.5%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $25,615 to $31,886 since August 26, 2010.
Tri-Star
24.4%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $9,140 to $11,372 since August 26, 2010.
PIPTRACKER
24.3%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $10,545 to $13,108 since August 26, 2010.
sp500-trading.com
24.2%

Based on change of hypothetical system equity from $14,050 to $17,450 since August 26, 2010.

Chatter

Show more 
Log in to add chatter

Ron Jaenisch

Today 16:11 ET

Guys I have had a many questions regarding does Babson Etf Timer qualify for an IRA. I am not an expert and would appreciate any input on this. Or perhaps an answer to the question what does it take in a stock trading system to be ok for an IRA?

Myth Buster

Today 11:25 ET

Inappropriate use of Chatter, AGAIN!

Ron Jaenisch

Today 11:22 ET

We appreciate your business. You have probably had questions concerning historical studies on Babson systems; this explanation should give you a deeper and richer understanding. Over time most systems developers make adjustments to their systems to adjust to the markets. This is because of beneficial improvements that they discovered they could add to their systems or because some indicator now works better. Most developers do this to adjust to the present market. Babson techniques are based upon the laws of physics and in principal have not changed over time. What has changed over time is our learning of various techniques that are necessary to apply the methods. This is because much of the notes of Dr. Andrews (who attended the Babson lectures) were hard to find and because we recently discovered some new ways to apply the Babson techniques. See video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keUHRxFbEl c This is partially why when people ask probing and never ending questions about our systems we do we refer them to the source of the information. In addition there are recent discoveries on our part due to computer testing. We have discovered ways to apply the principals that were not known and taught by Andrews in the past. All of this is combined is important when it comes to historical studies. I consider them kind of like fishing. If I send out the historical studies of the system as they are now improved I tend to say …… ;well we would have been fishing here on this day and over there on that day and caught this number of fish. C2 is better in this regard because you see in an audited record in real time that shows you exactly how our fishing might have done. When a developer sends you a historical study, it is nothing more than a what if of his most recent system or of how his system changes performed over time. C2 gives you the opportunity to see a track record that “what if changes were made” over time. This shows you the subscriber how the developer upgrades his own skill set/system over time. There is another very important reason not to ever send out a historical track record of the system we are using. This is because most hedge funds have on staff or access to Ph D’s whose job it is to reverse engineer systems. We see no reason to help these folks, especially when they complain in the C2 forum. After we perform historical studies we set them aside and do not discuss them in any way with the public. All that we focus upon is applying the improvements for our customers. To see the various Babson based systems go to http://babsontrading.autotradenow.com Regards Ron